Negligence in Sports Injuries Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Negligence in Sports Injuries - Essay ExampleWhere sporting events are concerned, the finding of negligence is complicated by the volenti non equalize injuria principle, whereby the underlying premise is that those who participate in sports knowing the risks that may exist5, are in effect, consenting to a breach of barter of care and and so negligence claims may not hold good6. For example, in the case of Woolridge v Sumner7 where a spectator was injured, it was held to be the result of an error of judgment rather than negligence. It was as well as held that liability could be established only when it could be shown that there had been a reckless disregard for the safety of the spectator/s.The notion of reckless disregard as laid out by Lord Diplock is inherently based upon the premise that a player acts negligently when he foresees risks and yet proceeds with his actions despite the risk. bold disregard thus involves a breach of not only the duty of care owed to prevent a claim of negligence, but also a duty of skill. Thus, in the case of Woolridge, for example, Lord Diplock clarified that when a participant was aware of his lack of skill to perform a sporting feat and the risk his lack of skill might pose to spectators, he would be guilty of negligence to the spectator, if he still goes ahead and performs the act in question8. As a result, period negligence implies the owing of a duty of care, reckless disregard implies the owing of a duty of care and a duty of skill. Reckless disregard is in essence, negligence applied within a sporting context, with a higher threshold to allow for the inherent risks in sports which players voluntarily assume under the volenti fit non injura principle.Reed, in analyzing the judgment rendered in the case of R v Barnes9 has explained how, within the context of sports, reckless disregard occurs when a player inflicts harm or defacement maliciously10. A defendant who is reckless is one who is able to foresee that there i s a risk for bodily harm occurring through his actions and yet, chooses to ignore the risk and go forward with the offending act. Recklessness implies a greater degree of culpability or wrongdoing than negligence because recklessness amounts to willfully exposing another person to harm and causation injury, rather than it occurring as a result of