Syllabus free essay sample

This rule will also apply foray problem switchover lower the he corresponding exam. The final exam is cumulative. The constructive contribution portion of yardage is bassoon positive and quality contributions shared in class, made with thoughtlessness and prepare prior to class meetings. The grade is not frontierswomen in class (quantity), but rather on the quality of the contribution. Key factors that will use in my assessment: In-class short surreptitiousness (see below) of interestingness-related articles. A positive attitude that enriches the learning experience of the class (e. . , committeewomen awards the course and the topic), in and out of the classroom. Help other students. Sharing With the class finance-relatednesss. Entering, leaving, or disturbing during class, and/or lack of attendance will have a negative effect on the grade. If you are unable to attend a class, please notify me beautify email. In-Class Presentation For few minutes in each class, a different groundhogs present and discuss an interconnections related to derivatives, speculation, or financial risk management. Review, review Quiz#l, Marketing strategies, Technologies, Product Service Considerations, Mergers and Acquisitions, Case #2 discussion Hawaii: Cocos Chinese Challenger 9 Review, Services, Overview FCC, SAL, Operations Group #1 Presentation- Apple, Read- Telethon due 1 0/1 6, Assignment, -Case #3-Faceable:, Due 10/23 16 Review, Moors Law, Group #2 Presentation-Monika Improving Market Position, Discussion Telethon, Summary so far Assignment Case #4 Canada Telecommunications: Industry regulation and policy ? due 11/20 23 Review, Quiz #2, Business Strategies, Case #3 discussion Faceable,Business Models 30 Review, Review Quiz#2, Policy, Segmentation, Recruiting Group #3 Presentation-Google, Business Plans, Read -Regulating Broadband for discussion on/due- 11/6 Novo. 6 Review, Group 4 Presentation ETC, Regulatory Status, Manufacturing overview, Customer Satisfaction, Discussion Regulating Broadband Read -Transforming Verizon for discussion on/due 1 1/20 13 Quiz #3 Review, Internatio nal Marketing, Supply Chain, Group #4 Presentation-RIM, Company Organization 20 Review, Review Quiz #3, Discussion -Regulating Broadband, Case #4Canada Telecommunications, Distribution strategies, Moon Walk 27 No Class- Thanksgiving DCE. Jeopardy Game, Review, Distribution strategies, future/trends, Managing Products/Services Group #5 Presentation-ETC: 11 Quiz #4 Review, Recap, Closing remarks The Case Studies Guidelines (Individuals and Group) Cases deal with real-life business situations. Analysis and discussion of cases provide a good augmentation of the real world with academia. The case method of learning requires the identification of the key problems and challenges the company is trying to solve. What information is useful and hat information is not useful, analysis to determine the root causes of the situation, and then suggest a plan of attack/recommendations should be included. There are no right or wrong answers. However, there are good and bad analyses and recommendations! Each student is expected to have fully prepared for the individual case as discussed above, and to be ready and willing to share his/her views with the class. One constant objective in every case discussion is to raise as many possible key issues in the case, and to have a full articulation (pros and cons) of these issues.Individual Case Guidelines 3 + written pages (you can add exhibits, if needed), to be handed in on the due date Position your paper as a memo/recommendation to senior management Provide your recommendations and the key reasons for your recommendations Solve the business problem(s) and justify your decision See the due dates in the syllabus Please put your name on each assignment AND i nclude the questions provided Individual cases that are late will be assessed puts each day that they are late Group Case Presentations All students must read the cases, BUT no written material is required, only the names need to present Follow the guidelines above for cases in general Groups will present as a team (all must be part of the presentation) 30-45 minutes (10-15+ slides recommended) See due dates in the syllabus Academic Honesty and Integrity Statement The University views academic dishonesty as one of the most serious offenses that a student can commit while in college and imposes appropriate punitive sanctions on violators. Here are some examples of academic dishonesty. While this is not an all-inclusive list, we hope this will help you to understand some of the things instructors look for. The following is excerpted from the University policy on academic honesty and integrity; the complete policy is available at http://women. Oscar. Nee. Deed/policy. HTML. Cheating intentionally using or attempting to use unauthorized materials, information or study aids in an academic exercise. This may include use of unauthorized aids (notes, texts) or copying from another students exam, paper, computer disk, etc. Fabrication intentional and unauthorized falsification, misrepresentation, or invention Of any data, or citation in an academic exercise. Examples may include making up data for a research paper, altering the results of a lab experiment or survey, listing a citation for a source not used, or stating an opinion as a scientifically proven fact. Plagiarism intentionally representing the words or ideas of another as ones own in any academic exercise without providing proper documentation by source by way of a footnote, endnote or intellectual note. Unauthorized collaboration Students, each claiming sole authorship, submit separate reports, which are substantially similar to one another.