Thursday, February 14, 2019
Drinking Status, Labeling, and Social Rejection Essay -- essays resear
drunkenness Status, Labeling, and friendly RejectionDrinking has been, for a long time, a in truth debatable topic. In the 1920s, imbibition was delayn as aboutthing so bad that it needed to be prohibited completely. inebriant consumption is still often seen as distasteful, especially in elephantine quantities. In this larn by Keith M. Kilty and Thomas M. Meenaghan, researchers looked at the drinking side of fictional people along with other factors such as get on and sex and asked participants to rate these people based on such attributes. The obligate mentions several reasons that this study is less limited than other studies referring to labeling. Other studies do acknowledged only social distance and since this study included fellowship acceptance and respect along with other characteristics of the soulfulnessality such as religion and duration, it explores a variety of different aspects of labeling and social rejection. In class, we talked slightly labeling in terms of IQ. We looked at the effects of labeling children as intelligent or slow and how these labels changed the way children approached their education. This study looks at labeling from a different perspective. instead than looking at the effects on the person who has been labeled, this study looks at how a label can affect someones sensing of another person. Using the social characteristics provided, the subjects draw conclusions about the fictional person according to respect, friendship acceptance, and social distance. We also talked briefly about aggregate abuse and how there is a difference between addiction and dependency. This baron tie into the discrepancy between problem drinker and alcoholic in the study. Different concourses gave these two categories different ratings which could be seen as a affinity between addiction and dependency and how the two different labels ar perceived. tercet sample groups were recruited for the study. The first was a group of 101 m ales and 104 females with an average age of 44.5 years this group was called the community group (C). The second was the practitioner group (P) with 73 males and 46 females with an average age of 27.1 they were all graduate students in the Graduate School of Social Work at Marywood College. The third and last-place group consisted of inmates, all male, with an avera... ... need to be in groups that have more(prenominal) racial and gender diversity. This would deal with a lot of the possible biases that are inherent in the study. It also might be arouse to include race or ethnicity as a description factor of the stimuli to see if that has an effect on the responses. The religions may need to be broadened in run to account for the religious diversity in our country. Although I think that the study is relevant to the topic of labeling, it might be better served in a broader context. However, too ofttimes variables would make it too difficult to decide what is create the response s. There is a thin line between too much and not enough in this situation. I think that this study gives interesting insight into what it might be like to be labeled as an alcoholic in our society and with an updated version, I think it could be very relevant to the study of alcoholism. Reference All the information in this report card was drawn from the article by Kilty, Keith M. and Meenaghan, Thomas M. out of the Journal of Social Psychology, 1973. The article is entitled Drinking Status, Labeling, and Social Rejection. I also pulled some of the information used from in class lectures.